The Italian psychiatric services organization during the COVID-19 pandemic

BACKGROUND: The present study aims to monitor how the Italian psychiatric services changed their organizations by adapting to the COVID-19 pandemic and considering the different incidence rates of the SARS-CoV-2 infection spread in the different Regions of Italy. METHOD(S): An on line "ad hoc" questionnaire was created and administered to all Italian Mental Health Departments. The questionnaire included various typologies of mental health setting such as Mental Health Service (MHS), the psychiatric therapeutic community (TC) and the psychiatric hospital ward (PH);the Region of Italy belonging to each participants is considered in accordance to the incidence of new cases per 100.000 inhabitants, as published by the Higher Institute of Health in the bulletin of 20 April 2020. Moreover, 9 questions were administered to investigate any challenges in several aspects influenced by the pandemic. RESULT(S): One hundred seventeen questionnaires were received, complete in their answers, 66 of which belonged to MHSs, 27 to TCs and 24 to PHs. The answers collected according to psychiatric settings were all statistically significant (P<0.05), except for item no.8 concerning the periodic checks of healthcare workers in the search for SARS-CoV-2 infection (p=0.432). Considering the answers received according to the incidence rate of new cases of COVID-19 per 100.000 inhabitants, as reported in the Higher Institute of Health on 20 April 2020, there was no significant statistical difference among the answers for all the items of the questionnaire, with the exception of item no.5 regarding patient care procedures (P=0.004) as at least partially - if not totally - all the psychiatric settings considered changed their procedures for patient care according to the incidence rate of the pandemic. CONCLUSION(S): The pandemic required providing greater assistance to both psychiatric patients already in treatment and to the new ones, the new accesses. On the other hand, however, the pandemic condition had strongly affected the provision of assistance mainly by reducing the provision of services, especially on the community and thus giving priority to the management of the COVID-19 pandemic.Copyright © 2021 EDIZIONI MINERVA MEDICA.

Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on utilisation of community-based mental health care in North-East of Italy: A psychiatric case register study.

AIMS: WHO declared that mental health care should be considered one essential health service to be maintained during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This study aims to describe the effect of lockdown and restrictions due to the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy on mental health services' utilisation, by considering psychiatric diagnoses and type of mental health contacts. METHODS: The study was conducted in the Verona catchment area, located in the Veneto region (northeastern Italy). For each patient, mental health contacts were grouped into: (1) outpatient care, (2) social and supportive interventions, (3) rehabilitation interventions, (4) multi-professional assessments, (5) day care. A 'difference in differences' approach was used: difference in the number of contacts between 2019 and 2020 on the weeks of lockdown and intermediate restrictions was compared with the same difference in weeks of no or reduced restrictions, and such difference was interpreted as the effect of restrictions. Both a global regression on all contacts and separate regressions for each type of service were performed and Incidence Rate Ratios (IRRs) were calculated. RESULTS: In 2020, a significant reduction in the number of patients who had mental health contacts was found, both overall and for most of the patients' characteristics considered (except for people aged 18-24 years for foreign-born population and for those with a diagnosis of schizophrenia. Moreover, in 2020 mental health contacts had a reduction of 57 096 (-33.9%) with respect to 2019; such difference remained significant across the various type of contacts considered, with rehabilitation interventions and day care showing the greatest reduction. Negative Binomial regressions displayed a statistically significant effect of lockdown, but not of intermediate restrictions, in terms of reduction in the number of contacts. The lockdown period was responsible of a 32.7% reduction (IRR 0.673; p-value <0.001) in the overall number of contacts. All type of mental health contacts showed a reduction ascribable to the lockdown, except social and supportive interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the access to community mental health care during the pandemic was overall reduced, the mental health system in the Verona catchment area was able to maintain support for more vulnerable and severely ill patients, by providing continuity of care and day-by-day support through social and supportive interventions.

Patient experience with telehealth service in a mental health setting.

The purpose of the quality improvement project is to explore the patient experience of telehealth services in a mental health setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. A cross-sectional survey design was deployed in an outpatient psychiatric setting. Forty-five participants completed the survey, and the smartphone was the most frequently used and preferred device for their telehealth service. Participants exhibited a high level of usability for telehealth services (Mean = 5.82, SD = 1.21). Telehealth can be a way to solve the problem of not having enough mental health services available, even though there are potential barriers such as digital literacy and human engagement.

Videoconference-based Creativity Workshops for mental health staff during the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 presented significant challenges to psychiatric staff, while social distancing and remote working necessitated digital communications. NHS England prioritised staff wellbeing. Arts-based creativity interventions appear to improve psychological wellbeing, so this study evaluated online Creativity Workshops as a staff support response for COVID-19-related stress. METHODS: Participants were staff from a South London NHS psychiatric hospital. Group Creativity Workshops were facilitated via Microsoft Teams. Acceptability data on pre- and post-workshop mood and attitudes were self-reported by participants. Feasibility data were gathered from adherence to number of workshop components delivered. RESULTS: Eight workshops were delivered in May-September 2020 (N = 55) with high adherence to components. Participants reported significantly increased positive mood and attitudes towards themselves and others; and decreased stress and anxiety. CONCLUSIONS: Online Creativity Workshops appear feasible and acceptable in reducing stress in psychiatric staff. Integrating a programme of Creativity Workshops within healthcare staff support may benefit staff wellbeing.

Self-Harm in Children and Adolescents Who Presented at Emergency Units During the COVID-19 Pandemic: An International Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare psychiatric emergencies and self-harm at emergency departments (EDs) 1 year into the pandemic, to early pandemic and pre-pandemic, and to examine the changes in the characteristics of self-harm presentations. METHOD: This retrospective cohort study expanded on the Pandemic-Related Emergency Psychiatric Presentations (PREP-kids) study. Routine record data in March to April of 2019, 2020, and 2021 from 62 EDs in 25 countries were included. ED presentations made by children and adolescents for any mental health reasons were analyzed. RESULTS: Altogether, 8,174 psychiatric presentations were recorded (63.5% female; mean [SD] age, 14.3 [2.6] years), 3,742 of which were self-harm presentations. Rate of psychiatric ED presentations in March to April 2021 was twice as high as in March to April 2020 (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.93; 95% CI, 1.60-2.33), and 50% higher than in March to April 2019 (IRR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.25-1.81). Rate of self-harm presentations doubled between March to April 2020 and March to April 2021 (IRR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.68-2.34), and was overall 1.7 times higher than in March to April 2019 (IRR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.44-2.00). Comparing self-harm characteristics in March to April 2021 with March to April 2019, self-harm contributed to a higher proportion of all psychiatric presentations (odds ratio [OR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.05-1.62), whereas female representation in self-harm presentations doubled (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.45-2.72) and follow-up appointments were offered 4 times as often (OR, 4.46; 95% CI, 2.32-8.58). CONCLUSION: Increased pediatric ED visits for both self-harm and psychiatric reasons were observed, suggesting potential deterioration in child mental health. Self-harm in girls possibly increased and needs to be prioritized. Clinical services should continue using follow-up appointments to support discharge from EDs. DIVERSITY & INCLUSION STATEMENT: One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science. We actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our author group. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work.

Analysis of the utilization, processes, and outcomes of inpatient mental healthcare during the first three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic in the federal state of North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany.

Background: During the first phase of the Coronavirus-19 disorder (COVID-19) pandemic in the spring of 2020, utilization of inpatient mental healthcare was significantly reduced. We now report on a long-term observational study of inpatient mental healthcare in a large psychiatric hospital association in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, covering the second and third pandemic waves of autumn and winter 2020 followed up until June 2021. Objectives: Analysis of the changes of inpatient and day patient mental healthcare utilization in an association of psychiatric hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic from January 2020 until June 2021. Materials and methods: We used the statistics database of the association of the nine psychiatric hospitals of the Rhineland Regional Council (Landschaftsverband Rheinland, LVR). We compared the case numbers of the pandemic period with previous years and analyzed changes in the diagnostic spectrum, rates of coercion and therapeutic outcomes. We also analyzed age, gender, diagnoses and coercive measures of patients tested positive for COVID-19 during inpatient psychiatric healthcare. Results: Case rates were reduced during and after the COVID-19 pandemic episodes of 2020 and the following months of spring and summer 2021. Changes varied between diagnostic groups, and there were even increases of case numbers for acute psychotic disorders. Coercive measures increased during the pandemic, but therapeutic outcomes were maintained at the pre-pandemic level. Women and patients of higher ages were overrepresented among psychiatric inpatients with COVID-19. Conclusion: The COVID-19 pandemic led to over during reductions of inpatient psychiatric hospital admissions and changes of the diagnostic spectrum accompanied by increased rates of coercive measures. These effects may reflect an overall increased severity of mental disorders during the COVID-19 pandemic, deferrals of inpatient admissions or a lack of outpatient mental healthcare services utilization. To differentiate and quantitate these potential factors, further studies in the general population and in the different mental healthcare sectors are needed. In order to reduce the number of COVID-19 cases in psychiatric hospitals, vaccination of people of higher ages and with dementias seem to be the most needed strategy.

Interventional Response of Hospital and Health Services to the Mental Health Effects of Viral Outbreaks on Health Professionals.

The aim of this integrative review was to examine the impact of past viral epidemics on staff mental health interventional responses, with a specific focus on healthcare provider response in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. Following PRISMA methodology, databases were searched for relevant articles. A total of 55 articles with a range of methodologies (e.g., commentary papers, cohort studies, qualitative studies) were included to ensure broad coverage of this rapidly emerging research area. The literature showed that many healthcare providers implemented a variety of wellbeing initiatives to support their staff during a viral outbreak. Most of these interventions, however, were not formally evaluated. Interventions included leadership/team support; online psychoeducational resources and updated information on the pandemic; respite spaces; peer support outreach; staff resilience training; telephone hotline support; staff support groups; and individual counseling. Staff were generally supportive of the initiatives offered by hospital and health services, with certain interventions being more appreciated (e.g., staff respite areas). Rapid, locally, and culturally appropriate workplace-based responses may counter the negative mental health impact on staff; but a stepped response is required for a smaller number of staff at risk of mental illness, or those with pre-existing mental illness. Systematic Review Registration: Unique Identifier: CRD42020222761.

The effect of the COVID-19 lockdown on mental health care use in South Africa: an interrupted time-series analysis.

AIMS: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and ensuing restrictions have negatively affected the mental health and well-being of the general population, and there is increasing evidence suggesting that lockdowns have led to a disruption of health services. In March 2020, South Africa introduced a lockdown in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, entailing the suspension of all non-essential activities and a complete ban of tobacco and alcohol sales. We studied the effect of the lockdown on mental health care utilisation rates in private-sector care in South Africa. METHODS: We conducted an interrupted time-series analysis using insurance claims from 1 January 2017 to 1 June 2020 of beneficiaries 18 years or older from a large private sector medical insurance scheme. We calculated weekly outpatient consultation and hospital admission rates for organic mental disorders, substance use disorders, serious mental disorders, depression, anxiety, other mental disorders, any mental disorder and alcohol withdrawal syndrome. We calculated adjusted odds ratios (OR) for the effect of the lockdown on weekly outpatient consultation and hospital admission rates and the weekly change in rates during the lockdown until 1 June 2020. RESULTS: 710 367 persons were followed up for a median of 153 weeks. Hospital admission rates (OR 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33-0.44) and outpatient consultation rates (OR 0.74; 95% CI 0.63-0.87) for any mental disorder decreased substantially after the introduction of the lockdown and did not recover to pre-lockdown levels by 1 June 2020. Health care utilisation rates for alcohol withdrawal syndrome doubled after the introduction of the lockdown, but the statistical uncertainty around the estimates was large (OR 2.24; 95% CI 0.69-7.24). CONCLUSIONS: Mental health care utilisation rates for inpatient and outpatient services decreased substantially after the introduction of the lockdown. Hospital admissions and outpatient consultations for alcohol withdrawal syndrome increased after the introduction of the lockdown, but statistical uncertainty precludes strong conclusions about a potential unintended effect of the alcohol sales ban. Governments should integrate strategies for ensuring access and continuity of essential mental health services during lockdowns in pandemic preparedness planning.

A reliability of the tele-neuropsychological assessment using the computerized Montreal Cognitive Assessment in community-dwelling older adults

Background: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) has been widely used to discriminate individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). As a tele-neuropsychological service has become important due to Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19), computerized neuropsychological assessments delivered by telehealth have recently been developed. However, to date, their reliability is unclear yet. Thus, this study was to investigate the reliability of the tele-neuropsychological assessment using the computerized MoCA (c-MoCA). Method: Thirty-four community-dwelling older adults (age: 65-86 years, 17 females) participated in this study. While the primary assessor scored the participant's performance by telehealth, the secondary assessor independently scored the performance by directly observing face-to-face. To establish the inter-rater reliability of the c-MoCA by telehealth, the absolute agreement and the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) were analyzed.

The impact and management SARS-CoV-2 in a psychiatric hospital setting

BACKGROUND: During the months of August and September 2020, an outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 took root in Mount Carmel Hospital and affected 29 elderly female chronic psychiatric inpatients, representing a significant clinical undertaking within the context of this low-resource healthcare setting. METHODS: An emergency isolation ward was set up to contend with the outbreak, while a medical response team comprised of two psychiatric doctors and five extended foundation trainees was established in order to care for this vulnerable patient cohort. Close liaison with the Infectious Diseases team at Mater Dei Hospital fostered an effective therapeutic setting within which these patients could be treated. This represented a unique approach in an environment where literature on SARS-CoV-2 is scarce - the psychiatric inpatient setting. RESULTS: All 29 of our patients recovered from SARS-CoV-2 during the course of this period as a result of close clinical observation, a system of twice-daily patient review, early identification of patient deterioration and effective cross-speciality communication. CONCLUSION: An outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 within the mental health inpatient setting represents a number of unique clinical, managerial and interpersonal challenges, though straightforward clinical measures and effective patient monitoring can greatly aid the response to viral outbreaks in low-resource healthcare settings.

Assessment of the teaching on alcohol use and management in current health professional curricula in India. (Special Issue: Health systems strengthening.)

Alcohol consumption is globally a serious public health challenge, and it is rampant across all parts of India. The COVID-19 pandemic has added to the overall burden of alcoholism due to long working hours, increased mental stress, depression, and so on. Primary care physicians have an important role in assessing risk and providing counselling, intervention and treatment of alcohol misuse. Studies have demonstrated primary health care facilities to be ideally suited for alcohol prevention and cessation interventions as most patients with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) seek treatment from facilities in the primary care setting in India. Thus, the training of healthcare professionals is vital in addressing AUDs in India. The Indian government is setting up Health and Wellness Centres across the country intended to address long-term care and holistic health promotion. At the same time, healthcare providers have expressed their limited competence in cessation and counselling practices related to AUDs. One of the attributing factors for these limitations is the paucity of exposure during the formative years. With this background, a review was undertaken of the current prescribed undergraduate professional curricula (medical, nursing, dentistry and physiotherapy) in India to assess its current status and preparedness in addressing alcohol misuse. The study findings emphasise the need to bolster the continuing education of health professionals aimed at health promotion and preventive strategies by hands-on training, brief workshops, supervised clinical experience by extramural faculty such as addiction psychiatrists, use of standardised patients, role play, and other similar methods.

Changes in Psychiatric Inpatient Service Utilization During the First and Second Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic has caused societal restrictions and public fear which may have impacted the pattern of seeking psychiatric care. There has generally been a decrease in the numbers seeking acute psychiatric care. It is important to investigate which groups seeking psychiatric treatment have decreased in number. The aim of our investigation was to identify which groups have a changed pattern in acute psychiatric service utilization during the first two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. The study investigated changes in the rate and pattern of visits and hospital admissions for psychiatric disorders at a large Swedish hospital. A register-based study was conducted using administrative data on adult psychiatric emergency department visits (PEVs) and hospital admission rates. Data during the first two COVID-19 waves were compared to corresponding control periods in 2018-2019. Furthermore, a survey was performed among patients visiting the Psychiatric Emergency Department on their views of COVID-19 and acute psychiatric care. During the COVID-19 periods, PEVs were reduced overall by 16 and 15% during the first and second wave, respectively (p < 0.001 in both cases), while the rate of admissions remained unaltered. PEVs were significantly reduced for most psychiatric diagnosis subgroups except for patients with schizophrenia and other related psychotic disorders as well as for those who required ongoing outpatient care. Most of the survey respondents disagreed that the pandemic affected their visit and about a quarter thought a video call with a doctor could have replaced their visit. In conclusion, there was a significant reduction in overall PEVs during both COVID-19 waves but this did not affect the numbers requiring admission for psychiatric inpatient care.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Financing of Psychiatric Services.

The onset of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 had a significant impact on the delivery of behavioral health services, with significant short-term and long-range consequences. Intertwined with the delivery of services has been the financial ramifications of the pandemic. The rapid response by governmental agencies to shore up financial support for clinical services, and the swift shift to virtual care provided relief for a broad array of practice settings; however, it did not mitigate the full impact of the pandemic. Effective state, national, and international leadership, communication, and coordination are critical to improve the global response to any pandemic.

Real-world effectiveness of repeated ketamine infusions for treatment resistant depression during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Herein we evaluate the impact of COVID-19 restrictions on antidepressant effectiveness of intravenous (IV) ketamine in adults with treatment-resistant depression (TRD). We conducted a case series analysis of adults with TRD (n = 267) who received four ketamine infusions at an outpatient clinic in Ontario, Canada, during COVID-19 restrictions (from March 2020 - February 2021; n = 107), compared to patients who received treatment in the previous year (March 2019 - February 2020; n = 160). Both groups experienced significant and comparable improvements in depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and anxiety with repeated ketamine infusions. Effectiveness of IV ketamine was not attenuated during the COVID-19 period.

Mental health and the COVID-19 pandemic: looking back and moving forward.

COVID-19 continues to exert unprecedented challenges for society and it is now well recognised that mental health is a key healthcare issue related to the pandemic. The current edition of the Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine focusses on the impact of COVID-19 on mental illness by combining historical review papers, current perspectives and original research. It is important that psychiatrists leading mental health services in Ireland continue to advocate for mental health supports for healthcare workers and their patients, while aiming to deliver services flexibly. As the pandemic evolves, it remains to be seen whether the necessary funding to deliver effective mental healthcare will be allocated to psychiatric services. Ongoing service evaluation and research is needed as the myriad impacts of the pandemic continue to evolve. In a time of severe budgetary constraints, ensuring optimum use of scare resources becomes an imperative.

Mental Health Services in Lombardy during COVID-19 outbreak.

Lombardy is the Region in Italy the most heavily affected by coronavirus disease (COVID-19) contagion. The Regional Health Authority mandates that mental health services should be guaranteed, identifying mental health as a priority for their citizens. Recommendations for occupational and health safety have been provided to patients and hospital staff, including support for telemedicine activities and remote psychosocial interventions. Services of the Mental Health Departments of Milano "Niguarda" and Brescia "Spedali Civili" Hospitals are providing continued care at a community, residential and hospital level, and to positive COVID-19 psychiatric patients in need of hospitalization.